New Research! Managed High Yield Bond Model
Background and Description
This model has been used by us since 1998 as a tool for our balanced portfolios, helping us choose whether to own high-yield or Govt bonds. We had always felt it was highly effective, but there
was little demand for such a model trading between these two asset classes. However, in the wake of the Fed's Zero Interest Rate policy, and with investors reaching for the yield oflower
rated bonds, a managed high yield product seems timely. High Yield bonds can be quite volatile, especially during economic contractions. While the yields on these bonds are
signifcant, normally 5-7 percentage points higher than comparable government bonds, they can fluctuate signifcantly in price. With those investors seeking yield also tending to be
highly risk averse, a model than can offer the benefits of high-yield bonds while offsetting some of the risk during periods of volatility or price weakness is an attractive investment
choice.
The Model is designed to hold high-yield bonds when the conditions for them are favorable, and their price action is trending favorably. At such times the client assets will be invested in high-yield bond funds for income and capital appreciation. When the model signal weakens, and Gov't Bonds become stronger, assets will be moved into intermediate government bond funds (5-7 yrs maturity), a fairly conservative holding. When conditions swing back to favorable for High Yield bonds, assets will be moved back into High Yield bond funds.
Year By Year Pro-Forma Historical Results
Year |
High Yield Bond Fund Buy/Hold (FAGIX) |
|
Government Bond Fund Buy/Hold (FGOVX) |
|
HBIR Managed High Yield Model |
||||||
1983 | 18.54 | 6.07 | 17.44 | ||||||||
1984 | 10.50 | 11.29 |
10.08 |
||||||||
1985 | 25.54 | 17.74 |
18.09 |
||||||||
1986 | 17.99 | 14.62 |
8.61 |
||||||||
1987 | 1.39 | 1.06 |
2.88 |
||||||||
1988 | 12.59 | 6.36 |
5.49 |
||||||||
1989 | -3.22 | 12.62 |
13.36 |
||||||||
1990 | -3.85 | 9.53 |
10.56 |
||||||||
1991 | 29.82 | 15.96 |
28.66 |
||||||||
1992 | 28.05 | 7.97 |
19.40 |
||||||||
1993 | 24.91 | 12.32 |
23.05 |
||||||||
1994 | -4.61 | -5.21 |
-3.79 |
||||||||
1995 | 16.74 | 18.07 |
14.46 |
||||||||
1996 | 11.41 | 2.08 |
6.53 |
||||||||
1997 | 14.71 | 8.93 |
14.34 |
||||||||
1998 | 4.77 | 8.59 |
14.48 |
||||||||
1999 | 13.27 | -2.25 |
10.63 |
||||||||
2000 | -9.43 | 12.63 |
12.43 |
||||||||
2001 | -4.66 | 6.72 |
-0.85 |
||||||||
2002 | -0.40 | 10.93 |
13.73 |
||||||||
2003 | 39.13 | 2.22 |
39.01 |
||||||||
2004 | 12.57 | 3.60 |
6.43 |
||||||||
2005 | 5.04 | 2.42 |
1.67 |
||||||||
2006 | 13.08 | 3.55 |
12.58 |
||||||||
2007 | 3.78 | 7.89 |
11.87 |
||||||||
2008 | -31.90 | 11.01 |
13.29 |
||||||||
2009 | 72.14 | 1.30 |
60.60 |
||||||||
2010 | 17.13 | 5.11 |
7.42 |
||||||||
2011 |
|
5.96 |
7.37 |
||||||||
2012 | 16.40 | 2.68 | 9.07 | ||||||||
2013 | 9.71 | -2.58 | 6.76 | ||||||||
2014 | 6.13 | 5.43 | 8.76 | ||||||||
2015 | -0.92 | 0.50 | 4.56 | ||||||||
2016 | 10.71 | 1.05 | 9.09 |
Risk/Reward Analysis
High Yield Bonds Buy & Hold
8 Down Years
Worst Year -31.90% in 2008
Average Annual Return 8.36%
Government Bonds Buy & Hold
2 Down Years
Worst Year -5.21% in 1994
Average Annual Return 7.65%
Managed High Yield Model
2 Down Years
Worst Year -3.79% in 1994
Average Annual Return 14.14%
Above Managed High Yield Model Results do not reflect any Management Fees. Subtracting the affect of a 1.5% Investment Management Fee would reduce the annual return to 12.64%, still several percentage points above either bond category on a buy and hold basis.
In Summary, the Managed High Yield Bond Model has a return profile greater to High Yield Bonds in terms of Average Annual Return, but it has a risk profile similar to Government Bonds in terms of down years and magnitude.
Hamilton-Bates Investment Research Disclaimer
The calculations of these results reflect what would have actually occurred had an investment
moved
according to the strategy’s respective buy and sells signals. Data for the calculation of performance
was obtained from sources believed reliable, but whose accuracy is not guaranteed. There may be variances in actual returns for a client’s account vs. the stated returns due to
transactions that may take place in an account such as additions and/or withdrawals, trading restrictions imposed by the custodian, or account inception dates. The stated returns include
the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. All mutual funds charge shareholders internal management fees and other fees, etc. Please refer to each fund’s prospectus for
details. All of the above strategies include the use of money-market funds. An investment in a money-market fund in neither insured nor guaranteed by the U.S. Government, and there can be
no assurance that the fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share. Because markets are influenced by a variety of changing conditions, future performance
based on prior results should not necessarily be assumed. The period covered was of generally rising prices and may not reflect material economic and market factors that may effect the
Advisor’s decisions in the future. It should be noted that the possibility of loss exists along with the potential for profit. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Please invest only after careful consideration of your needs, objectives, and risk tolerance.